AI in Education: Are We Creating Dependent Students?

The Double-Edged Sword of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Learning

The integration of artificial intelligence in education has accelerated at an unprecedented pace. In 2025, 92% of students now use AI tools regularly, representing a dramatic surge from just 66% in 2024. This explosive growth raises a critical question that educators, parents, and policymakers must confront: Are we enhancing learning or creating a generation of students who cannot function without AI assistance?

This comprehensive exploration examines the complex relationship between AI and student development, analyzing current research, real-world data, and expert perspectives to understand whether we’re witnessing educational transformation or cognitive erosion.

The Current State of AI Adoption in Education

Unprecedented Growth Rates

The statistics paint a striking picture of AI’s rapid infiltration into academic life. Among university students, 88% now use generative AI specifically for assessments in 2025, up from 53% in 2024. This represents more than simple adoption,it signals a fundamental shift in how students approach their education.

At the K-12 level, 60% of public school teachers used AI tools during the 2024-2025 school year, with 32% using them at least weekly. The most common applications include lesson preparation, administrative tasks, and creating customized learning materials. Teachers report saving approximately 5.9 hours per week by leveraging AI for routine tasks.

Student Usage Patterns

The ways students employ AI tools reveal both promise and concern. Approximately 51% of students use AI for brainstorming, while 53% use it to gather information. However, the line between assistance and dependency becomes blurred when students turn to AI for direct answers rather than guidance.

Usage increases with grade level, with 31% of 11th and 12th graders using ChatGPT for schoolwork, compared to 20% of 7th and 8th graders. This pattern suggests that as academic demands intensify, students increasingly rely on AI to manage their workload.

The Market Momentum

The financial investment in AI education tools reflects institutional confidence in the technology. The global AI in education market is projected to grow from $7.71 billion in 2025 to $32.27 billion by 2030, expanding at a compound annual growth rate of 31.2%. This massive growth indicates that AI integration isn’t a temporary trendit’s becoming foundational to modern education.

The Cognitive Dependency Crisis: What Research Reveals

The Critical Thinking Decline

Perhaps the most alarming research findings concern AI’s impact on critical thinking skills. A comprehensive study of 666 participants found a significant negative correlation between frequent AI tool usage and critical thinking abilities, with cognitive offloading acting as a mediating factor.

This cognitive offloading phenomenon occurs when individuals transfer mental tasks to external tools, reducing their own cognitive engagement. Research from Microsoft found an inverse correlation between confidence in AI and critical thinking: the higher a user’s confidence in AI, the lower their critical thinking scores.

Younger participants exhibited higher dependence on AI tools and lower critical thinking scores compared to older participants. This age-based disparity raises serious concerns about long-term cognitive development for students who grow up with AI as an educational crutch.

Problem-Solving Skills at Risk

The impact extends beyond abstract thinking to practical problem-solving abilities. Research conducted across Albanian educational institutions found a statistically significant negative correlation between reliance on AI tools for assignments and students’ problem-solving skills. Students who frequently depend on AI for completing assignments showed diminished capacity for independent problem-solving.

A systematic review published in Smart Learning Environments found that overreliance on AI dialogue systems can significantly impact decision-making, critical and analytical thinking abilities by fostering dependency and potentially diminishing individual judgment skills.

The Metacognitive Laziness Trap

Perhaps most concerning is what researchers call “metacognitive laziness.” Studies by Anthropic found that students were asking AI for direct answers almost half the time with minimal back-and-forth engagement. Even when students engaged in multiple conversational turns with AI, they still offloaded significant thinking to the system rather than processing information independently.

In writing experiments, students using AI were most focused on interacting with ChatGPT rather than engaging in the cognitive processes needed to synthesize, analyze, and explain ideas. This pattern suggests students are bypassing the cognitive struggle that’s essential for deep learning.

Memory and Retention Concerns

AI-based technologies raise significant questions about their implications on cognitive development, particularly in critical thinking, problem-solving, and recall. When students consistently outsource information retrieval and processing to AI, their own memory formation and retention mechanisms may weaken.

Research indicates that the act of struggling with informationthe cognitive effort required to understand, synthesize, and rememberis crucial for long-term learning. By eliminating this struggle, AI may inadvertently undermine the very learning it aims to enhance.

Academic Integrity: The Growing Crisis

Cheating Statistics

The rapid AI adoption has triggered an academic integrity crisis of unprecedented scale. AI cheating incidents increased from 1.6 students per 1,000 in 2022-23 to 7.5 students per 1,000 in 2024-25, representing a nearly 400% increase.

At Robert Gordon University, AI-related cheating incidents skyrocketed from just six cases in 2022/23 to 205 in the following academic yearan increase of over 3,000% in just 12 months. This explosive growth reflects both increased AI accessibility and student willingness to use it inappropriately.

The Gray Area of AI Assistance

The challenge extends beyond clear-cut cheating to murky ethical territory. Approximately 33% of students face accusations related to excessive AI use and plagiarism. Many students struggle to understand where helpful assistance ends and academic dishonesty begins.

While 18% of students have included AI-generated text directly in their work, many more use AI in ways that may not constitute direct plagiarism but still compromise learning. For instance, having AI generate essay outlines, summarize complex texts, or solve problem sets diminishes the cognitive engagement necessary for mastery.

Institutional Response Gaps

Despite widespread AI use, only 42% of students say their institution’s staff are well-equipped to help with AI, though this represents improvement from just 18% in 2024. This preparation gap leaves students navigating AI ethics without clear guidance.

Many institutions are scrambling to update academic integrity policies, but enforcement remains challenging. Detection tools exist, but they’re imperfect, and the rapid evolution of AI technology means policies quickly become outdated.

The Benefits: Why AI Isn’t Entirely Villainous

Personalized Learning at Scale

Despite legitimate concerns, AI offers genuine educational benefits. A pilot project in education demonstrated a 10% increase in learning outcomes through AI-powered personalized learning. When used appropriately, AI can adapt to individual learning styles, paces, and needs in ways that traditional one-size-fits-all education cannot.

AI technologies can improve retention rates by up to 30% through personalized learning approaches. By identifying knowledge gaps and adjusting instruction accordingly, AI helps ensure students master foundational concepts before moving forward.

Accessibility and Inclusion

Globally, there are 240 million children with disabilities, and AI offers unprecedented opportunities to make education more accessible. AI-powered tools can provide text-to-speech functionality, language translation, closed captioning, and simplified explanations that help diverse learners access educational content.

Students with learning differences, language barriers, or physical disabilities benefit from AI’s ability to present information in multiple formats and provide customized support that might not be available from overwhelmed teachers managing large classrooms.

Efficiency and Resource Optimization

Teachers benefit significantly from AI assistance. Teachers who use AI tools at least once a week save about 5.9 hours per week, mostly by reducing time spent on routine tasks. This time savings allows educators to focus on high-value activities like mentoring, facilitating discussions, and providing emotional supportthe irreplaceable human elements of teaching.

According to the World Economic Forum, less than 30% of teaching-related skills like mentoring and coaching can be handled by AI, making teaching among the least automatable professions. This suggests AI should complement rather than replace human educators.

Student Perceptions and Engagement

Approximately 65% of students agree that AI tools are essential for success. Whether this perception reflects reality or conditioning, it indicates that students view AI literacy as a critical skill for their futures.

Approximately 90% of students using ChatGPT for studying find it more beneficial than using a human tutor. While this statistic might concern educators, it also reveals AI’s potential to democratize access to learning support that many students couldn’t otherwise afford.

The Educator Perspective: Navigating Uncharted Territory

Teacher Concerns and Adoption

Teachers find themselves balancing enthusiasm for AI’s potential with legitimate concerns. About 27% of teachers are concerned that students may become too dependent on AI tools, while 26% fear the spread of misinformation from AI-generated content.

Approximately 23% of teachers feel they lack proper training to use AI effectively in education. This skills gap creates anxiety among educators who recognize AI’s importance but feel unprepared to integrate it responsibly.

Despite concerns, the World Economic Forum reports that 71% of teachers view AI assistants as essential for learning and workforce preparation. This suggests educators recognize that preparing students for an AI-integrated world requires teaching them to use these tools effectively.

The Professional Development Gap

Approximately 26% of districts planned to offer AI training during the 2024-2025 school year, with around 74% of districts planning to train teachers by Fall 2025. While this represents progress, it also reveals that most teachers are currently learning AI integration on their own.

About 59% of teachers expect students to have basic AI skills from Grade 6 through university. This expectation places pressure on both educators and students to develop AI literacy alongside traditional academic competencies.

Changing Pedagogical Approaches

An astounding 98% of teachers surveyed feel that students need some degree of education concerning the ethical uses of AI, with 61% believing comprehensive education is required. This near-unanimous view suggests the teaching profession recognizes that ignoring AI isn’t an optionthe challenge is teaching students to use it responsibly.

Over the next decade, 60% of teachers surveyed believe that AI will be used more widely in education, but not necessarily as a central component. This perspective envisions a hybrid model where AI enhances rather than defines the learning experience.

Global Perspectives: How Different Regions Approach AI Education

Asia’s Aggressive Adoption

In March 2025, South Korea launched AI-powered digital textbooks in primary and secondary schools, supported by an investment totaling around $830 million. The AI systems adjust homework and assignments based on each student’s learning level, behaviors, and tendencies, with the goal of providing personalized AI tutors for every child.

As of September 2025, China made AI a required subject in all primary and secondary schools. This mandated AI literacy reflects China’s strategic priority to lead in AI development and ensure its workforce possesses necessary technological skills.

Western Approaches

North American and European institutions have taken more cautious approaches, emphasizing ethical frameworks and governance structures before rapid deployment. North America accounts for the largest share of the global AI in education market at 36%, but adoption varies significantly by institution and district.

The United Arab Emirates is developing an AI-powered tutoring platform aligned to its national curriculum, aiming to train over 1 million people using AI by 2027. Meanwhile, Australia has implemented a National Framework for Generative AI in Schools focusing on transparency and responsible AI use.

The Equity Question

These varying approaches raise questions about global educational equity. Students in well-funded districts and countries gain exposure to cutting-edge AI tools, while those in under-resourced areas risk falling further behind. The Asia-Pacific region’s AI in education market is projected to grow fourfold between 2025 and 2030, potentially widening existing global achievement gaps.

Finding Balance: Strategies for Responsible AI Integration

Developing AI Literacy

Rather than banning AI or embracing it uncritically, education must focus on developing AI literacy. This includes teaching students:

• How AI works: Understanding machine learning basics, training data, and algorithmic decision-making helps students recognize AI’s capabilities and limitations.
• When to use AI: Students need frameworks for deciding whether AI assistance is appropriate for specific tasks.
• How to verify AI outputs: Critical evaluation skills become essential when AI can generate convincing but incorrect information.
• Ethical considerations: Privacy, bias, intellectual property, and academic integrity must be central to AI education.

Redesigning Assessment

Traditional assessment methods become problematic when students can easily use AI to complete them. Forward-thinking educators are shifting toward:

• Process-based evaluation: Assessing the thinking process rather than just final products makes AI shortcuts less effective.
• Collaborative projects: Group work emphasizing discussion, negotiation, and collective problem-solving leverages human strengths that AI cannot replicate.
• Oral presentations: Having students explain their reasoning in real-time reveals their actual understanding.
• Reflective components: Requiring students to articulate their learning process, challenges encountered, and how they overcame them focuses on metacognition.

The Hybrid Model

Research emphasizes that AI should complement and not replace human instruction, with students engaging in higher-order thinking while leveraging AI’s efficiency and personalization strengths.

The most promising approach involves AI handling lower-order cognitive tasksinformation retrieval, basic calculations, formattingwhile preserving higher-order thinking for human learners. This requires intentional instructional design that leverages AI’s strengths without ceding cognitive development to machines.

Teacher Training and Support

According to Self-Determination Theory, AI must generate autonomy and competence, not dependency. This principle should guide professional development programs that help teachers integrate AI effectively.

Teachers need training in:

• Recognizing signs of AI over-dependence in students
• Designing AI-resistant assignments that require genuine understanding
• Using AI as a teaching assistant rather than teaching replacement
• Facilitating discussions about responsible AI use

The Psychological Dimension: Student Mindsets Matter

Self-Regulation and Agency

Self-Determination Theory points to three psychological needsautonomy, competence, and relatednessthat are critical to motivation and learning. AI’s role must align with these principles rather than undermining them.

Research involving 580 Chinese university students found that greater AI dependence was associated with lower levels of critical thinking, with cognitive fatigue partially mediating this relationship. Interestingly, information literacy buffered the negative impact of AI dependence on critical thinking but also amplified cognitive fatigue when AI reliance was high.

This complex relationship suggests that simply teaching students about AI isn’t enoughthey need to develop self-regulation skills that help them use AI judiciously rather than reflexively.

The Confidence Factor

Microsoft’s research revealed that higher self-confidence correlates with greater use of critical thinking, while higher confidence in AI correlates with lower critical thinking. This suggests that building student confidence in their own abilities is essential for preventing excessive AI dependence.

Students who doubt their capabilities may turn to AI as a crutch, while those confident in their own thinking use AI as a tool. Educational approaches must therefore address self-efficacy alongside skill development.

Demographic Differences

Research shows that 28% of LGBTQ+ teens are more likely to use generative AI, which has negatively impacted their lives more than 17% of cisgender or straight young people. These disparities suggest that different student populations may experience AI’s effects differently, requiring nuanced, equitable approaches.

Long-Term Implications: What Future Are We Building?

Workforce Preparation

The use of AI at work nearly doubled between 2024 and 2025, with 40% of US employees now using AI a few times a year or more. This rapid workplace adoption means students need AI skills for future employment.

About 60% of Tennessee educators mention that AI skills can benefit students, and 69% feel that these skills will help students get high-paying jobs in the future. However, this workforce preparation argument must be balanced against concerns about cognitive development.

The Innovation Question

Will students who grow up with AI assistance develop the deep problem-solving skills needed for true innovation? History suggests that constraints and challenges drive creativity and breakthrough thinking. If AI removes these productive struggles, might we inadvertently hamper the development of tomorrow’s innovators?

An experiment on undergraduate students found that AI-supported students scored better on fluency, flexibility, and elaboration when generating ideas, but the use of AI had liabilities, including cognitive fixation and lower creative confidence as students over-relied on AI suggestions.

Social and Emotional Development

According to a survey conducted in October 2025, 60% of Gen Z workers who use AI tools talk to those tools as much or more than they talk to their coworkers, with almost half saying their AI tools know them better than their boss.

This statistic reveals a troubling trend: as AI becomes more conversational and personalized, it may supplant human relationships that are essential for social-emotional development. Educational approaches must ensure AI enhances rather than replaces the human connections vital for student wellbeing.

Policy Recommendations: Charting a Responsible Path Forward

Institutional Guidelines

Educational institutions should develop comprehensive AI policies that:

1. Clearly define acceptable use: Specific examples of appropriate and inappropriate AI applications help students make informed decisions.
2. Emphasize transparency: Students should disclose AI use, helping teachers understand when learning outcomes reflect human versus machine capabilities.
3. Differentiate by learning objectives: Some assignments might encourage AI experimentation while others prohibit it entirely, based on targeted skills.
4. Update regularly: AI evolves rapidly, requiring policy revisions at least annually.

Research and Monitoring

Future research should consider the long-term impact of AI on cognitive development, specifically on memory storage, critical thinking, and motivation in students. Longitudinal studies tracking students from early AI exposure through career outcomes would provide invaluable insights.

Educational institutions should implement monitoring systems that track:

• Student performance trends as AI adoption increases
• Correlation between AI use patterns and learning outcomes
• Skill development in critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving
• Emotional wellbeing and social development indicators

Equity Initiatives

To prevent AI from widening achievement gaps:

1. Universal access programs: Ensuring all students have access to AI tools prevents a two-tiered system where only affluent students gain AI literacy.
2. Teacher training equity: Professional development should reach educators in under-resourced schools, not just well-funded districts.
3. Bias auditing: Regular evaluation of AI tools for algorithmic bias helps ensure equitable treatment of diverse student populations.
4. Multilingual support: AI tools should support multiple languages to serve diverse student bodies effectively.

The Parent’s Role: Supporting AI-Literate, Independent Thinkers

Parents face the challenge of preparing children for an AI-integrated future while ensuring they develop fundamental thinking skills. Strategies include:

Encouraging Productive Struggle

Parents should resist the temptation to immediately provide answers or suggest AI solutions when children encounter difficulties. The cognitive struggle involved in problem-solving builds mental resilience and problem-solving capabilities that AI assistance can undermine.

Modeling Healthy Technology Use

Children learn from observation. Parents who thoughtfully use technology considering when digital tools are appropriate and when human thinking is better model the balanced approach children need.

Facilitating Offline Learning

Encouraging activities that don’t involve screens reading physical books, building projects, playing strategic games, engaging in sports ensures children develop diverse skills and don’t become overly dependent on digital assistance.

Asking About AI Use

Open conversations about how and when children use AI helps parents understand their child’s relationship with technology and provides opportunities to discuss responsible use.

Conclusion: Navigating the AI Education Revolution

The question “Are we creating dependent students?” doesn’t have a simple answer. The research reveals that AI in education is neither purely beneficial nor entirely detrimentalits impact depends entirely on how we integrate it.

The evidence is clear: increased reliance on AI tools correlates with diminished critical thinking abilities, primarily due to cognitive offloading. Students who use AI as a shortcut rather than a tool risk undermining the cognitive development essential for success.

However, AI also offers unprecedented opportunities for personalization, accessibility, and efficiency that can genuinely enhance learning when implemented thoughtfully. AI technologies can improve retention rates by up to 30% through personalized learning, suggesting that dismissing AI entirely would forfeit real educational benefits.

The path forward requires what we might call “digital wisdom”the ability to harness technology’s power while maintaining the human cognitive capacities that make us effective thinkers, problem-solvers, and innovators. This means:

• Teaching AI literacy alongside AI skepticism: Students need both the skills to use AI effectively and the critical thinking to question its outputs.
• Preserving cognitive struggle: Educational experiences must still challenge students to think deeply, even when AI could provide easy answers.
• Balancing efficiency and development: Time saved through AI should enable deeper engagement with complex problems, not simply reduce effort.
• Maintaining human connection: Technology should enhance but never replace the mentorship, collaboration, and relationship-building central to education.

The projection that teaching jobs in universities and higher education will grow by 24% between 2025 and 2030, with almost no risk of AI replacement, offers reassurance. Education remains fundamentally human, even as it incorporates powerful new tools.

We stand at a critical juncture. The decisions we make now about AI integration will shape not just individual student outcomes but the cognitive capabilities of entire generations. By acknowledging both AI’s promise and its perils, by implementing thoughtful policies and practices, and by keeping student development rather than technological capability at the center of our decision-making, we can harness AI to enhance education without creating dependency.

The goal isn’t to produce students who can perfectly collaborate with AIit’s to develop independent thinkers who choose when and how to use AI as one tool among many in their intellectual toolkit. If we achieve this balance, AI becomes an educational asset rather than a crutch, enhancing human capability rather than replacing it.

The future of education in the AI age isn’t predetermined. It will be shaped by the choices educators, policymakers, parents, and students make in the coming years. By proceeding thoughtfully, guided by research and grounded in timeless educational principles, we can ensure that AI enriches rather than diminishes the learning experience.

Sources

1. DemandSage. (2024). “71 AI in Education Statistics 2025 – Global Trends.” Available at: https://www.demandsage.com/ai-in-education-statistics/
2. Programs.com. (2024). “The Latest AI in Education Statistics (2025).” Available at: https://programs.com/resources/ai-education-statistics/
3. Youngstown State University. (2025). “AI and Its Impact in Today’s Classrooms.” Available at: https://online.ysu.edu/degrees/education/msed/ai-teaching-statistics-usage-and-trends/
4. Artsmart.ai. (2024). “AI in Education: 2025 Statistics & the Future of Learning.” Available at: https://artsmart.ai/blog/ai-in-education-statistics-2025/
5. Programs.com. (2025). “New Data: 92% of Students Use AI Tools Regularly.” Available at: https://programs.com/resources/students-using-ai/
6. AIPRM. (2024). “AI in Education Statistics.” Available at: https://www.aiprm.com/ai-in-education-statistics/
7. Anara. (2025). “AI in Higher Education Statistics: The Complete 2025 Report.” Available at: https://anara.com/blog/ai-in-education-statistics
8. Resourcera. (2025). “AI in Education Statistics (2025) Usage, Growth, And More.” Available at: https://resourcera.com/data/artificial-intelligence/ai-in-education-statistics/
9. Campbell University. (2025). “AI in Higher Education: A Meta Summary of Recent Surveys.” Available at: https://sites.campbell.edu/academictechnology/2025/03/06/ai-in-higher-education-a-summary-of-recent-surveys-of-students-and-faculty/
10. InclusiveTeach. (2025). “Statistics About AI in Education: 2025 Trends.” Available at: https://inclusiveteach.com/2025/10/19/ai-in-education-statistics-trends-and-challenges-2025/
11. National Science Teaching Association. “To Think or Not to Think: The Impact of AI on Critical-Thinking Skills.” Available at: https://www.nsta.org/blog/think-or-not-think-impact-ai-critical-thinking-skills
12. Smart Learning Environments. (2024). “The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review.” Available at: https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
13. Taylor & Francis Online. “Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations.” Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
14. ResearchGate. (2024). “Risks of AI-Assisted Learning on Student Critical Thinking.” Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382878289_Risks_of_AI-Assisted_Learning_on_Student_Critical_Thinking
15. PMC. “The cognitive paradox of AI in education: between enhancement and erosion.” Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12036037/
16. MDPI. (2025). “AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking.” Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6
17. The Hechinger Report. (2025). “University students offload critical thinking, other hard work to AI.” Available at: https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-offload-critical-thinking-ai/
18. Phys.org. (2025). “Increased AI use linked to eroding critical thinking skills.” Available at: https://phys.org/news/2025-01-ai-linked-eroding-critical-skills.html
19. Student Journal of Information Privacy Law. (2025). “The Growing Dependency on AI in Academia.” Available at: https://sjipl.mainelaw.maine.edu/2025/03/31/the-growing-dependency-on-ai-in-academia/
20. ScienceDirect. (2025). “Learners’ AI dependence and critical thinking: The psychological mechanism of fatigue and the social buffering role of AI literacy.” Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825010388
21. eLearning Industry. (2025). “How AI Is Transforming Personalized Learning In 2025 And Beyond.” Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/how-ai-is-transforming-personalized-learning-in-2025-and-beyond
22. World Economic Forum. (2024). “5 ways AI can benefit education.” Available at: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/05/ways-ai-can-benefit-education/
23. eSchool News. (2025). “Digital testing, AI, and personalized learning in 2025.” Available at: https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2025/01/10/digital-testing-ai-and-personalized-learning-in-2025/
24. Engageli. (2025). “20 Statistics on AI in Education to Guide Your Learning Strategy in 2025.” Available at: https://www.engageli.com/blog/ai-in-education-statistics
25. Workday. (2025). “AI in the Classroom: Personalized Learning and the Future of Education.” Available at: https://blog.workday.com/en-us/ai-in-the-classroom-personalized-learning-and-the-future-of-education.html
26. eLearning Industry. (2025). “Personalized Learning Platforms In 2025: AI In Education.” Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/ai-in-education-personalized-learning-platforms
27. eLearning Industry. (2025). “AI-Powered Adaptive Learning: Ushering In A New Era Of Education In 2025.” Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/ai-powered-adaptive-learning-ushering-in-a-new-era-of-education-in-2025
28. The Hunt Institute. (2025). “AI Tutoring in Schools: How Personalized Learning Technology is Changing K-12 Education in 2025.” Available at: https://hunt-institute.org/resources/2025/06/ai-tutoring-alpha-school-personalized-learning-technology-k-12-education/
29. arXiv. (2025). “AI and personalized learning: bridging the gap with modern educational goals.” Available at: https://arxiv.org/html/2404.02798v2
30. eLearning Industry. (2024). “AI-Powered Learning: The Future Of Personalized Education.” Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/ai-powered-learning-the-future-of-personalized-education